Text Size 


Print
Program Evaluations
Service Evaluation: Spring 2001
All students using Disability Support Services, and a random selection of faculty using Disability Support Services on behalf of their students, were surveyed in regards to their satisfaction of service.
All responders rated services provided as satisfactory to excellent.
All responders rated services necessary and essential to student success.
Student Success Indicators
Fall 2002
- All students with disabilities - Mean GPA 2.6134
- Students with Disabilities using Accommodations - Mean GPA 2.785
- All 2002 Freshman N=62 - Mean GPA 2.434
- 2002 Freshman using Accommodations N=49 - Mean GPA 2.5664
Spring 2002
- All students with disabilities - Mean GPA 2.623
- All students - Mean GPA 2.725
Fall 2001
- All Students with disabilities - Mean GPA 2.608
- All students - Mean GPA 2.731
Spring 2001
- All students with disabilities - Mean GPA 2.681
- All Students - Mean GPA 2.805
Fall 2000
- All students with disabilities - Mean GPA 2.66
- All Students - Mean GPA 2.731
Retention Indicators
- December 2002 Graduates - 13
- December 2002 Withdraws - 5
- December 2002 Probations - 2
- December 2002 Suspensions - 4
Retention / Graduation Information
| Graduation Rates | ||
|---|---|---|
| University at Large | Students with Disabilities | |
| 4 year Graduation Rates | ||
| 1996 | 37.5% | 66% |
| 1997 | 40% | 48% |
| 1998 | 44% | 45% |
| 5 year Graduation Rates | ||
| 1996 | 54% | 77% |
| 1997 | 58.6% | 65% |
| 1998 | ||
| 6 year Graduation Rates | ||
| 1996 | 57.3% | 80% |
| 1997 | ||
| 1998 | ||
| Retention Information | ||
| Fall-to-Sprint Retention Rates | ||
| University at Large | Students with Disabilities | |
| 1996 | 92.1% | 94.6% |
| 1997 | 93.7% | 94.4% |
| 1998 | 91.3% | 95.4% |
| 1999 | 92.4% | 100% |
| 2000 | 93.4% | 92.5% |
| 2001 | 92.5% | 98.7% |
Program Evaluations
The Division of Student Affairs is committed to evaluating the effectiveness of department sponsored programs. The information gathered about learning, effectiveness of presenter, and content will help the department review the aspects of the program should continue and the areas need to be reevaluated.