Problematic Behaviors During Adolescence: Jeffrey J. Haugaard

Introduction:

Adolescence as a likely time for the development of problematic behaviors.

    Changes in hormones, external appearance, nature of school, new activities (e.g. dating)

The importance of addressing problematic behaviors during adolescence

    reduce suffering for teen, reduce suffering for others, reduce social costs (e.g. antisocial damage)

Fundamental principles

    There are no simple answers

        Behaviors are influenced by many factors

        Different combinations of influences affect different people in different ways

        Influences interact and influence each other

                Bidirectional influence of factors - shy teen becomes depressed, others avoid her,
                    she withdraws into substance abuse

    Several problematic behaviors can occur together

            different problems may have a common cause - e.g. depression & substance abuse

    Behaviors exist on a continuum

            most characteristics have a "normal" level, a "slightly problematic" level, and a
            "pathological" level - e.g., use of alcohol

    Most behaviors result from decisions made by an adolescent

            risky behaviors, lifestyle decisions often result in trouble or pathology among teens

            some disorders do not necessarily result from decisions, such as depression, shyness,
                narcissism

    Defining problematic behaviors involves value judgments

        e.g., use of marijuana, alcohol, shyness

Chapter 2:  Designating adolescent behaviors as problematic

    focus on ages 12-21

    definition: perplexing, requires a solution, difficult, troublesome

    we must be careful in deciding to "label" a teen - can be a self-fulfilling prophesy,
            can also haunt the teen for many years, if not forever

    can we clearly define problematic behaviors

            deviate from the "norm" ?

            anorexia - criteria includes 15% or more below expected body weight

            age differences - drug experimentation at 10 is different than at age 18

            are the behaviors harmful to the person?  smoking?

            harmful to others?  aggression, assault

            cultural context - what the culture defines as healthy vs unhealthy

   Who decides a behavior is problematic?

            society, peers, the teen, and family
 

ADDITIONAL MATERIAL:

        Personality Disorders (PD) in Childhood and Adolescence


4/4/01

Shyness

    occurs in social contexts

    some physiological and emotional symptoms - anxiety

    negative thoughts of self

    awkward social behaviors (averting eye contact)

    not the same as introversion

    shyness is only one type of social anxiety

    not just the same as embarrassment

    Fearful vs Self-Conscious shyness

            fearful begins in the first couple of years of life, self-conscious tends to begin
            in the 4th or 5th (after development of social emotions, such as guilt and empathy)

        Fearful shyness may be more influenced by Temperament (behavioral inhibition)

About 40% of individuals consider themselves shy

More males than females consider themselves shy

Peak shyness often associate with entry into school, beginning of puberty, and entry into junior high

Shyness is probably stable throughout life

THE EXPERIENCE OF SHYNESS

physiological/emotional, cognitive, and behavioral experiences

Physiological/emotional - feeling slightly "sick" in certain situations, flushing, speech difficulties

Cognitive - many self-critical thoughts in social situations, believe they are deficient and ineffective, others are judging him/her

Behavioral - avoid social situations, less adept in social contacts, speak less and more quietly, tend not to initiate conversation, avert eye contact, nervous gestures, migrate to edge of group, more likely to succumb to pressure to change a stated position

Self-Consciousness - reflect on shy experiences and agonize over them

    become self-conscious about their self-consciousness

    cognitive monitoring lowers social effectiveness even more

DEVELOPMENT

    heightened sensitivity to criticism from others

    Moderately strong genetic influence exists for shyness - twins

    A child born timid is more likely to develop a low level of confidence in social situations

    Parents may contribute by focusing on the importance of paying attention to social scrutiny
    and encouraging flawless social skills

    Mothers who are more likely to teach social behaviors in a coercive manner - and are more
    embarrassed, angry, and disappointed when child's social performance is lacking

    Shy adolescents are more likely to attribute their own behavior and others' behavior to
    internal causes

    lack of social skills is a personal failure

INTERVENTIONS

teaching social skills

teach listening skills - focus on others, not yourself!

attack negative thoughts

get on the horse and ride!
 

ADDITIONAL MATERIAL:

        Personality Disorders (PD) in Childhood and Adolescence


4/6/01

Sensation-seeking, risk-taking, and reckless behaviors

    auto accidents, unwanted pregnancies, autoerotic asphyxiation, train surfing,
    spear fishing in shark-infested waters

    these kinds of behaviors are at their peak during adolescence

    Marvin Zuckerman - sensation-seeking - the need for varied, novel, and complex sensations and experience, willingness to take physical and social risks

    Arnett - substantial personal and social costs

    risk-taking vs reckless  -  degree of likelihood of personal or social costs

    risk-taking is higher in males than females at all ages - may be genetic, may be that males
    have a naturally lower level of arousal

   Gardner - - rational choice - it is more rational for adolescents to engage in risky behavior
        adolescents are more uncertaint of their futures than adults - when faced with uncertainty, the rational response is to maximize immediate benefits at the risk of future and unpredictable benefits

Thinking styles - more likely than adults to focus on the short-term benefits than the long-term benefits of risks - and less likely to consider the negative, long-term consequences

    e.g., condoms, marijuana, sunbathing

    related to actually experiencing consequences - less likely to do it again

    adolescents with more negative views of the future are MORE likely to take risks

David Elkind - adolescent egocentrism - but the few studies conducted indicate teens feel NO greater immunity from harm than adults

        high risk-takers rate the possibility of harm THE SAME as teens who take few risks

Teens influence on each other

    groupthink - let's all do it - peer influence is strong - you're a "geek" or afraid if you don't

Alcohol and drugs

    clearly promotes risky behavior - logic goes out the window

Benefits

    arousal & excitement

            sympathetic NS - fight or flight -

        Protective frame - where is the line between excitement (arousal)and danger (trauma)?

            different cognitive interpretation of the physiology of arousal

            fallacious frame - person feels protected when they're not

                as such, they don't take necessary precautions - ("This person loves me, wouldn't
                    harm me, so I we don't need to use protection.")

            teens have less input from others who have experienced harm in certain situations - parents - and
            take advice from other teens (faulty advice)

Natural selection and risky behavior

        over the course of evolution, risky behavior has been selected FOR; taking risks
        has OFTEN ENOUGH been rewarded that it has remained in the gene pool

            more advantageous for males - fighting - high esteem of the male group

                (why females are attracted to the fighter, the football hero?)

    Edgework and the development of the autonomous self

        negotiating the boundary between chaos and order

        exploring one's limits

            fear gives way to a sense of exhiliration - perceptual field becomes focused, resulting
            in a sense of cognitive control over the environment

            stimulates a heightened sense of self and feeling of omnipotence

        Teens often feel others are controlling them at a time when they want control - parents,
            teachers - so edgework is more rewarding

Interventions

        focus on cognitions, think about consequences - give real experience with the consequences -
            visit a hospital and people who have lung cancer

        develop strategies for activities that are risky but don't have the same consequences


April 9, 2001

Chapter 5:  Narcissism

self love and self-adoration  -  normal vs abnormal

narcissists focus almost exclusively on themselves, believing they deserve special treatment, and show little regard for others

often manipulative

grandiose, hostile, selfish facade hides a foundation of inferiority and shame

adolescence is a time of excessive focus on the self

Greek myth; Freud's theory - narcissism is a normal aspect of infancy; when frustrations arise, energy is withdrawn - relating to others only when they are useful for meeting a personal need

Moderate levels of self-focus are healthy - maintain a positive self-image

lower than normal levels of self-regard can result in depression, constant deference to others

higher than normal levels are extremely frustrating to people who must interact with the narcissist

The experience of narcissism

overt and covert aspects

Overt:
self-centeredness, grandiosity, entitlement, exploitativeness, sensitivity to criticism, hostility,

Covert:
shame, fragile self-worth, dependence on others (for fragile self-worth)

Development of problematic narcissism

disturbed early parent-child relationships - parents who repeatedly evaluate child negatively and use shame to mold child's behavior - children develop fragile self-worth and high levels of shame

narcissistic style protects person from feeling the shame

    ("we are the all singing, all dancing crap of the world")

"stage parents" - expect their young child to behave in ways that show others that the parents are competent and wonderful

    child does this by consistently acting attractive, engaging, charming, and brilliant

    child is expected to behave in ways that benefit the parents

    as she grows, she learns that she is not loved by her parents for who she is, but for how she can
        reflect on her parents - how she can make them look good

    anger, hostillity, self-doubt, fragile self-worth emerge from this new view of herself and her family

    some children become depressed, some become angry, some become narcissistic

    child adores herself, since she receives no honest adoration from parents, and in order to protect her
    fragile self-concept

Interventions

Obstacle - they don't believe they need intervention

    believe the problems they encounter are the fault of others

    therapists should NOT challenge the adolescent's view of herself and the world

        they meet challenges with defensive hostility

    Rather, therapist should gently explore the hurt and anger the adolescent experiences
        at the hands of others - later, help the teen explore her fears about her self-worth - as she
        learns to tolerate self-doubts, she can be encouraged to see how they influence her
        interactions with others - therapist is dealing with the covert characteristics


Chapter 10 - Physical Aggression

Aggression is promoted in many contexts in our society.

Adolescents are expected to turn it on and off quickly in certain situations (e.g., football)

Official reports (police) underestimate levels of aggression - only 15-30% of aggressive offenses result in an arrest, and arrests typically occur after a person has a history of aggression

Self-reports show higher levels of aggression, but even then most people, including adolescents, underreport

Minority youth are more likely to be arrested

Definition - behavior designed to harm another

Predatory aggression = instrumental aggression :  meant to harm another (low level of fear, arousal)

Affective aggression = reactive aggression : defend oneself (high level of fear, arousal)

Most adolescents engage in both types of aggression

Relative rates of aggression across age is fairly stable


Pathways

    longitudinal research shows:

1.     normal aggression early, then decline  (most common)

2.     consistent aggression over time (socialization may not work as well with them)

3.     early onset and increase over time (socializaton may not work, and they may be physiologically more prone)

4.     late onset (early inhibition, then lessening of inhibition, e.g., Mike Tyson)

Influences:

    Biology - some people more prone, but the environment can influence biology
        (stress increases testosterone)

    Number of risk factors (stressors in environment) are predictive of aggression

    Genetic influences are unclear

        Perhaps there is a genetic influence on impulsivity and emotional reactivity

        Temperament - uninhibited - less responsive to reinforcement/punishment - seek out risky endeavors

    Testosterone - inhibits neurotransmitters that inhibit impulsiveness - social dominance (higher in
        hierarchy): leaders have higher levels of testosterone, but not necessarily higher aggression - boys
        lower in the hierarchy may be more aggressive but don't have higher levels of testosterone - social
        dominance related to testosterone, but physical size was predictive of aggression

       CB:          It may be that pheromones released by males with higher levels of testosterone are perceived
                        by other males - allowing high T males to ascend to the highest positions in the dominance
                        hierarchy without having to be as aggressive

    Other research shows that after, not before competitive situations, testosterone is higher

Damage to the hypothalamus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex have been associated with higher levels of aggression

Low levels of alcohol are disinhibitory

Repeated child abuse may grow more neurons that serve to process fear and anger - so these people are simply more prone to think of or respond to aggression in the environment

Different effect for boys and girls, however: boys show increased arousal, girls decreased arousal (sounds like tendency for males to externalize anger, while females internalize anger)

Animal models: expose young hamsters to aggression from adult males, they are later inhibited in relations with older males but more aggressive with same age males

Culture can promote or inhibit aggression

Coercive family dynamics: some parents withdraw discipline when children are aggressive - teaches children that's how you get your way

Levels of corporal punishment by parents predicts aggression in children - even as young as 2 years of age

    abused children expect others to be abusive toward them - hypersensitive

TV affects aggression about 10% - same % as the influence of smoking on developing cancer

Emotional - Cognitive influences:

    frustration leads to higher aggression

Interventions:

    Legal (usually don't work)
    In-home family counseling (effective)
    Individual cognitive techniques - don't try to eliminate feelings, but change actions - shown effective


 Chapter 11 - Sexual Assault and Coercion

what is consensual?

some estimate that 50-60% of adolescent girls have had such an experience

26% of college males admit to using coercion

Malicious sexual coercion - knowingly coercive -

        one theory suggests coercion is about domination over women (or men) (aggression is the goal)

        a second theory suggests sexual gratification is the goal

        a third theory suggests some men (women?) are motivated to have sex that is aggressive/coercive
                (or, both are the goal)

Some argue men are biologically more prone to be sexually coercive, due to the stronger control testosterone has over sex drive and behaviors

Attitudes of male superiority over women - degradation of women - women want sex even when they say they don't - consequences aren't that bad

    adolescents frequently endorse the statement: it is ok for a man to coerce a woman if they have
        been dating at least 6 months

Men whose peers place a high value on sexual prowess

Growing up in families where sexual or physical abuse occurred

Pornography: repeated exposure to sexually aggressive movies increases likelihood of sexual aggression

Can distinguish between males in college who are more aroused when viewing a woman being physically assaulted

    Also, rapists become more aroused when listening to audiotapes of rapes

Alcohol use increases likelihood of sexual coercion

    But, only about 1/2 of the cases of rape occur when alcohol is involved

Sexually coercive male is motivated to have frequent sex, perceives barriers to having sex as often as he likes, and has attitudes that allow him to justify coercion

The "domination" male is likely to have experienced abuse or witnessed frequent abuse in his home

            May be primarily angry, and it is easier to take it out on women

Men who want "aggressive sex" may have experienced poor socialization - lack appropriate social skills
 

Miscommunication / non-malicious coercion:

    Many men misinterpret female cues and signals

        Many males - not just those who become coercive - perceive females to be interested in sex based on
            a broad range of characterstics and behaviors

        The length of time of a sexual encounter does predict whether or not it will result in sexual coercion
            - letting it go on a long time makes it more likely that sex will occur

        Cultural beliefs in the responsibility of males to initiate sexual encounters

Prevention & Treatment:

    educational programs:  low effectiveness
    Aversive conditioning: controversial effectiveness

Unfortunately, this chapter did not address some key issues regarding adolescent sexuality that are important:

    Adolescents are just learning how to deal with their sexual abilities and desires.

        Understanding NO when a woman says no, to the adolescent, is probably more difficult
            than it is for an adult (or, a typical adult)

        Adolescents are LESS likely to evaluate negative consequences as being negative (we knew this
            already from the topic "risk-taking")

        Adolescents are LESS likely to be in control of what their hormones are telling them to do

        Adolescents are MORE likely to need approval of others, and males will definitely brag about
            sexual conquests to their peers to improve their status and reputation

        Adolescent girls may be LESS likely to feel physically capable of warding off an advance from
            an adolescent male whose physical strength is likely far above hers

        Adolescent girls are sometimes MORE likely to believe that coercion isn't coercion - they
            don't know better because in some situations they haven't talked about it enough with
            people who have the correct information

        And in some cases, adolescent girls are MORE likely to accept coercion because she wants
            to be liked by the male - pressure to have a partner

                ALL of the above are MORE likely during early and middle adolescence than
                        late adolescence (college)