General Education Course
Component Matrix
French 201
Department: EPML
Proposed Course Prefix/Number: French 201
Course Title: Intermediate French I
What General Education Goal is this course intended to address?
__Goal 10__
Outcomes
|
Required Outcomes for this Goal (list below) |
Relevant Course/Institutional Components (refer
specifically to course syllabus) |
Specific Assessment
Method for Outcome |
|
1. Demonstrate the ability to understand,
interpret, and produce both oral and written communication in a foreign
language (French). |
Understand
(and produce): class primarily taught in French. Students engage in role plays, discussions, skits, dialogues,
presentations. Interpret: lab exercises: “Devoirs »,
(ch.1, 9/10). Produce:
Students speak French in class; discussion of reading p.132 in ch.4 (10/24);
writing ex. p.149 D in ch.4 (10/31). |
Oral
communication: in two oral exams (10/8 – 10/12; 11/28-11/30) students must
understand and produce French. Tracking/Reporting:
Mean score of class out of 100 points. Listening
comprehension exercises in every exam. Tracking/Reporting:
Mean score of 18 points. Written
skills: Composition writing (“Redaction” 9/17)). Tracking/Reporting:
Mean score of class out of 100 points. Reading
in French: final exam: reading with comprehension questions . Tracking/Reporting:
Mean score of class out of 12 points. |
|
2. Demonstrate an understanding of
relationships among the products, perspectives, and practices of the (French
and Francophone) culture studied. |
Discussion
of French meals p.62 in ch.2 (9/14), how they differ from typical American
meals, and how they reflect certain ideologies regarding life style;
discussion of French modes of transport p.132 in ch.4 (10/24). Discussion
of the increasing “invasion” of English words into the French language, and
how it is perceived by various segments of the French population, such as for
example French adolescents vs the “Academie francaise”. |
Oral
exam #2 (11/28-11/30): cultural correctness in dialogues. Tracking/Reporting:
Mean score of class out of 12 points. In small groups,
students will debate the notion of language “purity”, from the perspective of
the French “establishment” and of French adolescents, after having prepared
and written Individual rubrics. They
will be graded on validity of arguments, vocabulary, grammar , and
pronunciation. Tracking/Reporting:
Mean score of class out of 100 points. |
|
Required Outcomes for this Goal (list below) |
Relevant Course/Institutional Components (refer
specifically to course syllabus) |
Specific Assessment Method for Outcome |
|
3. Develop insight into the nature of (French
and Francophone) language and culture. |
Students
will become aware of the importance of using the appropriate form of address
“tu” familiar, or “vous” formal (ch.1, p.7, 8/31), and the cultural
implications of using each one. |
Composition
(“rédaction’” 9/17) in the form of a dialogue will test the proper usage of
“tu” and “vous”. Tracking/Reporting:
Mean score of class out of 10 points. |
General Education Criteria
|
General Education Criteria |
Relevant Course Components (refer specifically to course
syllabus) |
|
1. Teach a disciplinary
mode of inquiry and provide students with practice in applying inquiry, critical
thinking, problem solving. |
French
201 students use language and culture to communicate and solve problems, and
to investigate and discuss the artifacts and characteristics of French and
Fracophone culture. Sample ex.:
Students will explain the use of “tu” and “vous” and of the proper greeting
gestures (such as kissing and shaking hands)…How can this distinction between
familiarity and formality be made in English? (ch.1, p.7; 8/31). Students
will role play ordering a meal in a French restaurant, demonstrating their
knowledge of cultural correctness in the choice and order of dishes and
drinks (ch 2, .p.49; 59-61; 9/14), for example, the student playing the role
of waiter will have to explain why the restaurant cannot provide milk to
accompany a French dinner, and the diner will solve the problem of what to
order instead. |
|
2. Provide examples of how
disciplinary knowledge changes through creative applications of the chosen
mode of inquiry. |
Students
study in ch.5 various aspects of French and Francophone culture, such as the
French press. Using the vocabulary
and the grammatical structures needed to express opinions and persuade (ch.5,
p.198; 11/6), students will engage in small group discussions about which
French magazines they would like to read and why. Students
create projects such as for example a French song, an illustrated children’s
book, or a virtual trip to a French speaking region or city. |
|
3.
Consider questions of ethical values |
Students
use the subjunctive with expressions of necessity to express their opinion of
how people should act in a certain situation. Sample ex.: After consulting a list of programs offered on
French television (ch.5, p.174-75; 11/12), students will draw up a list of guidelines
telling a babysitter which programs the children must or must not watch,
using expressions of necessity and the subjunctive, and giving reasons for
objecting to certain programs containing violence or nudity. |
|
General Education Criteria |
Relevant Course Components (refer specifically to course
syllabus) |
|
4.
Explore past, current, and future implications of disciplinary knowledge. |
Students
study the history of education in France, its relationship to the Church and
to the State (ch.2, p.78-79; 9/21).
They will explore the past and present systems of education, and
consider how it may develop in the future. |
|
5.
Encourage consideration of course content from diverse perspectives. |
Students
study perspectives, practices, and products of French and Francophone
culture, making comparisons with those of their own culture. Sample ex.: how and why French parents
raise their children differently from parents in the US (ch.3, p.112;
10/19). Sample ex.: compare and
contrast the French and the American education system, and give advantages and
disadvantages for each one. |
|
6.
Provide opportunities for students to increase information literacy through
contemporary techniques of gathering, manipulating, and analyzing information
and data. |
Students
write their composition and their project on a computer, using French word
processing, and gather and analyze information from the Web, and in library
sources, before writing them (“redaction” 9/17, project 10/17). |
|
General Education Criteria |
Relevant Course Components (refer specifically to course syllabus) |
|
7.
Require at least one substantive written paper, oral report, or course
journal and also require students to articulate information or ideas in their
own words on tests and exams. |
Students
produce a written paper (“rédaction”, 9/17); undergo two oral exams
(10/8-10/12 and 11/28-11/30); create a project that involves writing and oral
presentation; students speak French in class everyday, and answer short essay
questions on every exam. |
|
8.
Foster awareness of the common elements among disciplines and the
interconnectedness of disciplines. |
Students learn, speak, and write about diverse aspects of the
history and life of French and Francophone people through the grill of
another language: a foreign language course involves elements of history, geography,
literature, business and economics, sociology, education, political science,
art, music… Sample ex.: Students
discuss how the French Revolution has shaped the political and social climate
in contemporary France, and how it has influenced the political ideology in
the US. (ch.3, p.119-120; 10/19). |
|
9.
Provide a rationale as to why knowledge of this discipline is important to
the development of an educated citizen. |
Competence in more than one language enables people to look beyond their customary borders, and act with greater awareness of self, other cultures, and their own relationship to those cultures. Drawing on the cultural and historical knowledge gained through this course, an educated citizen leader will consider world historical events from a different point of view. For example, in ch.5, students will examine WW2 from a French point of view, focusing on the role of de Gaulle’s and Petain’s radio addresses (p.202-204; 11/19). |